Abstract:
Historically, the female figure has often been used to express the artist's emotions
or ideas. It is not only the figure that is important but the manner in which it is
portrayed. It has been represented as an object of fertility , love, sexuality,
sensuality etc. and has been used repeatedly in Greek Mythology.
In Greece, before the fourth century B.C., sculptures of young women were usually
clothed while those of young athletes were normally naked. By the fourth century
statues of nude women were beginning to be made to express ' ideal nudity'. This
ideal developed around the cult of Aphrodite, the love goddess. To the Romans it
was the goddess, Venus.
The Greek Master Praxiteles created the first significant Aphrodite statue (Fig. 1. ·1)
for the island of Chidos. The s-shape of this voluptuous female nude, becomes a
familiar symbol of desire in later works.
During the middle ages there was little interest in portraying naked women in the
arts, except in instances where there was a need to symbolize fleshly lusts. Only
during the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, did women begin to play a more
important role in courtly life and were expressed more in the arts and letters.
With the rise of the age of chivalry came the cult of the Virgin Mary in the Church.
The virgin counterbalanced the idea of Eve the Temptress that had dominated the
thinking during the earlier years of the Middle Ages. Mary achieved a position of
honour and even of power in the masculine world of knighthood and the crusades.
These images of women at the royal courts or the Virgin Mary were depicted fully
clothed. Despite this, their femininity was not completely hidden but accentuated
by the slightly seductive s-curve posture present in the Virein of Paris (Fig. 1.2) Even though there is a similarity between the Viq~in of Paris and the Aphrodite
due to their femininity and the s-curve posture, they are quite different. According
to Hobbs [1975: 153] 'Aphrodite' is a goddess of beauty whose nudity implies an
acceptance of the human body. The 'Virgin of Paris' is a spiritual figure whose
beauty exemplifies a beatitude transcending the earthly body.
The Italian Renaissance, a form of society based on city-states, overtook the Feudal
system of the middle ages. The church began to lose its influence on the artists, as
they began to work for the wealthy noblemen who held political power. Men like
Lorenzo de Medici inspired a new interest in the arts of the Greek culture. It was
not easy for the artists of the fifteenth century to narrow the gap between the
goddess of love and the Christian Virgin. The medieval attitude of the female image
still prevailed. Images of naked men took on the role of becoming symbols or
representations of biblical heroes e.g. like Michelangelo's David, or symbols of the
growing middle class society of traders. Femininity was out of style.
Sandro Botticelli managed to create one of the most enduring versions of Venus
Aphrodite in art history e.g. the Birth of Venus (Fig. 1.3). Although Botticelli's
'Venus' is a naked woman she creates a different, almost sacred atmosphere in
comparison to the nudes that follow. She 'floats' above the ground and is
characteristic of medieval·'Jhristian art (angels and virgins).
The Venetian artist, Titian, painted the Venus of Urbino (Fig. 1.4) nearly sixty
years later. There is nothing medieval about this nude. Her facial expression
combined with her passive almost seductive posture signifies she is available for
pleasure. Through this work Titian established a convention of female nudity that
was to endure for centuries. Versions of this pose have been repeated in countless
works.
By the seventeenth century, Rubens's paintings (Belgium) of nude women, like
Titian's goddess, seem uninhibited about their nakedness. They lack the medieval
reserve that is still found in Botticelli's Venus. In The JudKement of Paris (Fig.l .5) Rubens portrays a Greek story of a beauty contest between Athena, Aphrodite and
Hera.
The appearance of nude female images managed to survive even the nineteenth
century Victorian period. The sight of a woman's ankle was even considered
provocative during these times. Even the use of the word 'leg' was considered
indecent.
Yet the art of the time was full of sexually titillating paintings of Turkish harems,
Roman slave markets and orgies. As long as the nudes in a work were considered
classical and the subject matter could be interpreted as information to teach historical
or moral lessons, it was approved.
Western painting and the Venus theme had survived over a period of 400 years. In
the early twentieth century, the female form was still present. The modern
movement grew stronger. The traditional practice of realistically illustrating a
subject or nude was overlooked and classical themes seemed to lose their credibility
in an increasingly scientific and materialistic world.
During the early years of the twentieth century artists sought solutions to overcome
the limitations of realism. Picasso's solution broke the rules of composition,
including the conventions of the nude. This is made clear in his painting, The
Dance. (Fig. 1.6)
Matisse's approach was to turn the female ~ure into just another compositional
element as can be seen in Dance (Fig. 1. 7) Occasionally, both these artists, in
their later years, returned to slightly more traditional methods of representing the
female nude.
Many artists began to apply the new techniques discovered, to traditional subject
matter. When we look at the British artist Henry Moore, we find that his sculptures
were some of the more successful efforts at interpreting the female figure in new ways. He does not necessarily portray the female body as beautiful, yet his work
was. often very sexual in nature. This is due to the fact that he used semi abstract
shapes to suggest, rather than represent parts of the body e.g. ReclininK FiKure
(Maquette) (Fig. 1.8). He started to experiment with open sculpture. Moore began
with 'natural' open spaces, such as that formed by the elbow the woman is leaning
on or that which exists below her raised knee. Often he would distort them, making
a space larger or smaller than viewers would expect, sometimes even eliminating
parts of the body.
Moore's sculptures create different ideas in viewers' minds as they move around the
massive form. Some see landscape-like forms, e.g. mountains and caverns, which
suggest a reassuring permanence. Others tend to see body shapes or sexual
allusions. His sculptures are more than just the body of a woman, they can be seen
as an affirmation of life itself.
During the 1960's, artists went back to more realistic representations of the human
figure. They leaned towards the 'comic strip' type of representation and advertising.
Pop Artists, such as Andy Warhol and Tom Wesselman created satirical versions of
the modern Venus. Warhol took the ideal woman off her pedestal and put her on
the supermarket shelf. She became as common and as interchangeable as a line of
food cans.
Tom Wesselmann's Seascape (Fig. 1.9) reflects the dehumanisation that occurs in
a mass-media, mass-production modern world and implies that the status of women
has become likewise (as dehumanised and mass-produced.)
Wesselmann created a series of Great American Nudes. Each one is set in a collage
environment of sexual symbols and products which advertising has made necessary
to life. It is almost as if the Venus ha~ become a figure whose only features are
sexual.ways. He does not necessarily portray the female body as beautiful, yet his work
was. often very sexual in nature. This is due to the fact that he used semi abstract
shapes to suggest, rather than represent parts of the body e.g. ReclininK FiKure
(Maquette) (Fig. 1.8). He started to experiment with open sculpture. Moore began
with 'natural' open spaces, such as that formed by the elbow the woman is leaning
on or that which exists below her raised knee. Often he would distort them, making
a space larger or smaller than viewers would expect, sometimes even eliminating
parts of the body.
Moore's sculptures create different ideas in viewers' minds as they move around the
massive form. Some see landscape-like forms, e.g. mountains and caverns, which
suggest a reassuring permanence. Others tend to see body shapes or sexual
allusions. His sculptures are more than just the body of a woman, they can be seen
as an affirmation of life itself.
During the 1960's, artists went back to more realistic representations of the human
figure. They leaned towards the 'comic strip' type of representation and advertising.
Pop Artists, such as Andy Warhol and Tom Wesselman created satirical versions of
the modern Venus. Warhol took the ideal woman off her pedestal and put her on
the supermarket shelf. She became as common and as interchangeable as a line of
food cans.
Tom Wesselmann's Seascape (Fig. 1.9) reflects the dehumanisation that occurs in
a mass-media, mass-production modern world and implies that the status of women
has become likewise (as dehumanised and mass-produced.)
Wesselmann created a series of Great American Nudes. Each one is set in a collage
environment of sexual symbols and products which advertising has made necessary
to life. It is almost as if the Venus ha~ become a figure whose only features are
sexual.ways. He does not necessarily portray the female body as beautiful, yet his work
was. often very sexual in nature. This is due to the fact that he used semi abstract
shapes to suggest, rather than represent parts of the body e.g. ReclininK FiKure
(Maquette) (Fig. 1.8). He started to experiment with open sculpture. Moore began
with 'natural' open spaces, such as that formed by the elbow the woman is leaning
on or that which exists below her raised knee. Often he would distort them, making
a space larger or smaller than viewers would expect, sometimes even eliminating
parts of the body.
Moore's sculptures create different ideas in viewers' minds as they move around the
massive form. Some see landscape-like forms, e.g. mountains and caverns, which
suggest a reassuring permanence. Others tend to see body shapes or sexual
allusions. His sculptures are more than just the body of a woman, they can be seen
as an affirmation of life itself.
During the 1960's, artists went back to more realistic representations of the human
figure. They leaned towards the 'comic strip' type of representation and advertising.
Pop Artists, such as Andy Warhol and Tom Wesselman created satirical versions of
the modern Venus. Warhol took the ideal woman off her pedestal and put her on
the supermarket shelf. She became as common and as interchangeable as a line of
food cans.
Tom Wesselmann's Seascape (Fig. 1.9) reflects the dehumanisation that occurs in
a mass-media, mass-production modern world and implies that the status of women
has become likewise (as dehumanised and mass-produced.)
Wesselmann created a series of Great American Nudes. Each one is set in a collage
environment of sexual symbols and products which advertising has made necessary
to life. It is almost as if the Venus ha~ become a figure whose only features are
sexual.