Abstract:
The necessity of developing broadly based in-house toxicology screening procedures and
their associated databases in any department purporting to offer a toxicology service,
cannot be overestimated. The development, in the past twenty years, of a number of
different immunoassay techniques with which a large number of target compounds can
be detected very selectively, all too often lulls the physician treating a drug overdose case
into a false sense of security once a specific compound has been identified This is so
because, once a drug has been identified which appears to account for the patient's
condition, the search for other possible contributors is more often than not, abandoned.
The aim of this study was to develop a screening procedure for neutral and acidic drugs
in the urine of poisoned patients to complement the already existing gas chromatographic
screening procedure for basic drugs. Sixty different substances were identified as a
nucleus with which to launch the project. These substances were selected on the basis of
their availability to the public and on data of overdose cases treated in this laboratory
during the past twenty three years.
Information on a large number of published screemng procedures for these type of
compounds and the various techniques involved in their isolation, detection and
identification, was collected initially. These techniques were subsequently- optimised
with the aim to develop a combined high performance liquid chromatography / diode
array detector / UV spectral database based screening procedure which is simple and can
be performed rapidly at reasonable costs. The liquid-liquid extraction procedure for
acidic and neutral drugs, with diethyl ether as organic solvent and a clean-up washing
step with lead acetate solution, gave good recoveries and yielded chromatograms with
little interference by endogenous compounds.
The general applicability of this screening procedure in a senes of suspected drug
• overdoses, has lead to the isolation and identification of a number of drugs added as standards to the spectral database as well as some unexpected compounds which were
subsequently added to the database. Metabolites of several drugs were also identified in
the urine of patients in some of the case reports presented. The data on these
compounds were likewise added and are still being added to the spectral library
whenever new data become available during the treatment of overdose cases. The
metabolite patterns of drugs obtained in this way are invaluable additions to the
screening procedure as they contribute significantly to making the identification of
isolated drugs unambiguous.
The simplicity and speed of the developed screemng procedure, makes it ideal for
toxicological screening since the whole procedure can be performed in under an hour.
Because a simple liquid-liquid extraction procedure is used, the costs are less than
normally encountered with solid phase extraction methods. Moreover, it is certainly
much cheaper and faster than a series of immunoassay-based target analyses which
would be needed to cover even a small fraction of the compounds which can be isolated
and identified by this broadly based procedure.
The results obtained in this study demonstrated that selective testing could have grave
consequences for the patient. Commercially available quick tests for toxicology
screening can be misleading because clinicians can get a false impression of the abilities
oflaboratories rendering such services. This was illustrated in a number of case studies
by using the screening procedure developed during this study. A good example is the
case in which theophylline was found during an HPLC screening. On the basis of the
patient's history the clinicians only requested target analyses for anticonvulsants of which
two were actually found in the patient's plasma and of which one was at a concentration
which could account for the patient's clinical condition. The high plasma level of
theophylline assayed subsequent to theophylline being detected in the stomach content,
could have been fatal. It can be concluded that this project yielded a comprehensive and versatile screening
method and database for the identification of acidic and neutral drugs in urine. The data
obtained during several of the case studies contributed information which was useful in
the treatment of the patients involved