DSpace Repository

Stream flow analysis and comparison of methods for base flow separation : case study of the Modder River basin in central South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Welderufael, W.A.
dc.contributor.author Woyessa, Y.E.
dc.contributor.other Central University of Technology Free State Bloemfontein
dc.date.accessioned 2015-09-03T09:58:22Z
dc.date.available 2015-09-03T09:58:22Z
dc.date.issued 2009
dc.date.issued 2009
dc.identifier.issn 1684498X
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11462/375
dc.description Published Article en_US
dc.description.abstract A stream flow at an outlet of a catchment can be entirely a base flow or direct flow or a combination of both. The base flow component of a stream is mainly contributed from the ground water storage which often is an open aquifer whereas the direct flow component is mainly the result of a direct response of a rainfall event. The Upper Modder river basin catchment is considered to be the origin of the Modder River which supplies water to Rustfontein Dam, situated at the outlet of the C52A with an area of 928 km2. Nine years of daily stream flow showed a continuous none zero discharge throughout the year. During the rainy season the discharge of the stream increases significantly. Thus, it is necessary to separate the direct and base flow of the stream in order to understand the important component that is more likely to be affected by different land use changes in a catchment. The Modder river daily mean flow at the inlet of Rustfontein dam (in Central South Africa) was analysed using four base flow separation methods, the Nathan & McMahon (N&M), the Chapman, Smakhtin & Watkins (S&W) method and the frequency duration analysis. All the methods gave higher percentage of the low flow component, except for the S&W method which underestimated it. The N&M filtering equation gave base flow components greater than 66% in 1999 and increased to 84% in 2007 while the Chapman equation revealed 65% and 74% in 1999 and 2007, respectively. Similarly, the frequency duration analysis gave 62% in 1999 and increased to 79% in 2007. The frequency duration analysis gave up to 13% lower percentage than the N&M (1990) filtering equation. The nine year base flow averages are 69%, 69% and 75% for frequency duration analysis, Chapman (1999) and N&M (1990) filtering equations, respectively. The result revealed that the Modder River is largely supplied by the ground water discharge. The result seemed to concur with the fact that for a semi-arid catchment such as the Modder river basin, with an average annual runoff coefficient of approximately 6%, the contribution of annual rainfall to direct runoff is very minimal. en_US
dc.format.extent 3 366 224 bytes, 1 file
dc.format.mimetype Application/PDF
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Interim : Interdisciplinary Journal, Vol 8, Issue 2: Central University of Technology Free State Bloemfontein
dc.relation.ispartofseries Interim : Interdisciplinary Journal;Vol 8, Issue 2
dc.subject Stream flow en_US
dc.subject Base flow en_US
dc.subject Direct flow en_US
dc.subject Flow separation en_US
dc.title Stream flow analysis and comparison of methods for base flow separation : case study of the Modder River basin in central South Africa en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.rights.holder Central University of Technology Free State Bloemfontein


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account