DSpace Repository

A New Hybrid MCDM Model: Sustainable Supplier Selection in a Construction Company

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mati´c, Bojan
dc.contributor.author Jovanovi´c, Stanislav
dc.contributor.author Das, Dillip Kumar
dc.contributor.author Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
dc.contributor.author Stevi´c, Željko
dc.contributor.author Sremac, Siniša
dc.contributor.author Marinkovi´c, Milan
dc.date.accessioned 2021-01-03T09:58:21Z
dc.date.available 2021-01-03T09:58:21Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.other doi:10.3390/sym11030353
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11462/2099
dc.description Published Article en_US
dc.description.abstract Sustainable development is one of the most important preconditions for preserving resources and balanced functioning of a complete supply chain in different areas. Taking into account the complexity of sustainable development and a supply chain, different decisions have to be made day-to-day, requiring the consideration of different parameters. One of the most important decisions in a sustainable supply chain is the selection of a sustainable supplier and, often the applied methodology is multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM). In this paper, a new hybrid MCDM model for evaluating and selecting suppliers in a sustainable supply chain for a construction company has been developed. The evaluation and selection of suppliers have been carried out on the basis of 21 criteria that belong to all aspects of sustainability. The determination of the weight values of criteria has been performed applying the full consistency method (FUCOM), while a new rough complex proportional assessment (COPRAS) method has been developed to evaluate the alternatives. The rough Dombi aggregator has been used for averaging in group decision-making while evaluating the significance of criteria and assessing the alternatives. The obtained results have been checked and confirmed using a sensitivity analysis that implies a four-phase procedure. In the first phase, the change of criteria weight was performed, while, in the second phase, rough additive ratio assessment (ARAS), rough weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS), rough simple additive weighting (SAW), and rough multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC) have been applied. The third phase involves changing the parameter r in the modeling of rough Dombi aggregator, and the fourth phase includes the calculation of Spearman’s correlation coefficient (SCC) that shows a high correlation of ranks. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Symmetry en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Symmetry;2019, 11, 353
dc.subject Sustainability en_US
dc.subject Supplier Selection en_US
dc.subject Construction en_US
dc.subject FUCOM en_US
dc.subject Rough COPRAS en_US
dc.subject Rough en_US
dc.subject Dombi Aggregator en_US
dc.title A New Hybrid MCDM Model: Sustainable Supplier Selection in a Construction Company en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account