dc.contributor.author |
Stott, P. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Theron, E. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2020-02-10T11:10:16Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2020-02-10T11:10:16Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2016-06 |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.17159/2309-8775/2016/v58n2a2 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/11462/2040 |
|
dc.description |
Published Article |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
The estimation of clay fraction is important for predicting the engineering properties of a
soil. SANS 3001 GR3 (SANS 2011) specifies a procedure for clay fraction determination using
a hydrometer. It has long been suspected that there may be flaws in this approach. Some of
the possible sources of error have been suggested, but little or no change has been made in
the standard procedures for assessment of clay fraction in well over half a century. This paper
deals with a microscopic examination of some typical South African clayey soils to assess the
adequacy of dispersion and possible consequences for clay fraction determination in currently
specified hydrometer procedures. Clays are examined both with and without dispersant, and
with and without labelling of clay minerals using an exchangeable cation dye. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering;Vol 58 No 2, June 2016, Pages 14–24, Paper 1232 |
|
dc.title |
Shortcomings In The Estimation Of Clay Fraction By Hydrometer |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |